Difference between revisions of "Introduction to Dispensationalism"

From 2Timothy2.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(Main Body)
(What is Dispensationalism?)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==What is Dispensationalism?==
 
==What is Dispensationalism?==
 
*what is dispensationalism?
 
*what is dispensationalism?
**This is not really an answerable question because dispensationalism can be broken into many different sects.  Geisler defines a dispensation as "a 'divine order of affairs' or a 'period of administration.'  It is a specific time in the unfolding drama of redemption wherein God ordains a specific arrangement of events and commands for a specific purpose.  His purpose includes the feat of evil."<ref>Geisler, Norman L. Systematic theology: In one volume. Bethany House, 2011. pg 796</ref> In the 19th century, Nelson Darby developed a perspective based upon a literal interpretation of scripture in which he broke up the way God deals with mankind into dispensations instead of covenants.  This work started the dispensational movement.  It is important to realize that many elements of dispensationalism were around from the start of the church, but the label began with Darby.  There is actually a lot of confusion about dispensationalism and part of that confusion is probably because the Scofield Reference Bible states that "a dispensation is a period of time during which man is tested in respect to his obedience to some specific revelation of the will of God." <ref>pg. 4</ref>. Ryrie notes that criticism of Scofield's definitions are valid because "a dispensation is primarily a stewardship, administration, or arrangement and not a period of time."<ref>Ryrie, Charles Caldwell. "The Necessity of Dispensationalism.”." Vital Prophetic Issues: Examining Promises and Problems in Eschatology (1956). pg. 5</ref>
+
**This is not really an answerable question because dispensationalism can be broken into many different sects.  Geisler defines a dispensation as "a 'divine order of affairs' or a 'period of administration.'  It is a specific time in the unfolding drama of redemption wherein God ordains a specific arrangement of events and commands for a specific purpose.  His purpose includes the feat of evil."<ref>Geisler, Norman L. Systematic theology: In one volume. Bethany House, 2011. pg 796</ref> In the 19th century, Nelson Darby developed a perspective based upon a literal interpretation of scripture in which he broke up the way God deals with mankind into dispensations instead of covenants.  This work started the dispensational movement.  It is important to realize that many elements of dispensationalism were around from the start of the church, but the label began with Darby.  There is actually a lot of confusion about dispensationalism and part of that confusion is probably because the Scofield Reference Bible states that "a dispensation is a period of time during which man is tested in respect to his obedience to some specific revelation of the will of God." <ref>pg. 4</ref>. Ryrie notes that criticism of Scofield's definitions are valid because "a dispensation is primarily a stewardship, administration, or arrangement and not a period of time.  Age and dispensation are not synonymous in meaning even though they may exactly coincide in history."<ref>Ryrie, Charles Caldwell. "The Necessity of Dispensationalism.”." Vital Prophetic Issues: Examining Promises and Problems in Eschatology (1956). pg. 5</ref>. The key is that a dispensation is the stewardship, administration, or arrangement and so the definition must emphasize these elements.  Additionally, dispensations build upon each other, this does not mean that everything from a previous dispensation will carry into the next dispensation, but it does mean that there may b overlap.  Ryrie define a dispensation to be "a distinguishable economy in the outworking of God's purpose."<ref> Ibid.</ref>

Revision as of 16:50, 24 January 2019

Objectives


Opening

  • What words, if any, come to mind when you hear the word dispensationalism?

Main Body

What is Dispensationalism?

  • what is dispensationalism?
    • This is not really an answerable question because dispensationalism can be broken into many different sects. Geisler defines a dispensation as "a 'divine order of affairs' or a 'period of administration.' It is a specific time in the unfolding drama of redemption wherein God ordains a specific arrangement of events and commands for a specific purpose. His purpose includes the feat of evil."[1] In the 19th century, Nelson Darby developed a perspective based upon a literal interpretation of scripture in which he broke up the way God deals with mankind into dispensations instead of covenants. This work started the dispensational movement. It is important to realize that many elements of dispensationalism were around from the start of the church, but the label began with Darby. There is actually a lot of confusion about dispensationalism and part of that confusion is probably because the Scofield Reference Bible states that "a dispensation is a period of time during which man is tested in respect to his obedience to some specific revelation of the will of God." [2]. Ryrie notes that criticism of Scofield's definitions are valid because "a dispensation is primarily a stewardship, administration, or arrangement and not a period of time. Age and dispensation are not synonymous in meaning even though they may exactly coincide in history."[3]. The key is that a dispensation is the stewardship, administration, or arrangement and so the definition must emphasize these elements. Additionally, dispensations build upon each other, this does not mean that everything from a previous dispensation will carry into the next dispensation, but it does mean that there may b overlap. Ryrie define a dispensation to be "a distinguishable economy in the outworking of God's purpose."[4]
  • Geisler, Norman L. Systematic theology: In one volume. Bethany House, 2011. pg 796
  • pg. 4
  • Ryrie, Charles Caldwell. "The Necessity of Dispensationalism.”." Vital Prophetic Issues: Examining Promises and Problems in Eschatology (1956). pg. 5
  • Ibid.